Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave Irving's avatar

It's all about underwriting the expense of CBD office space, and supporting video rental shops … err … cafes who would otherwise go under.

Expand full comment
harry's avatar

Weird argument. People were required to work from home because of Covid and now you want employers to pay them to return to the office. And what does high inflation have to do with this issue - wage growth currently at 4% is contributing to inflation and it will make an above-average contribution if productivity falls as a result of working from home. If a mutual agreement can be devised to permit high levers of working from home then go for it. Otherwise employees need to accept the terms of the contract you were employed under or quit.

This sort of advocacy sounds like pursuit of the "no production" option often advocated by the Labor Party. In effect: We don't need a productive private economy - we can live on government spending, taxes on the rich and welfare payments to almost everyone. .

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts