Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ziggy's avatar

I detect in your last few posts the germ of an argument:

1. Net zero is imperative for Australia.

2. Nukes may be a technological path to net zero, but make no economic sense.

3. The Right loves them some nukes and hates all other net zero.

4. (???) Given political economy, nukes may nevertheless make some sense.

Expand full comment
John Haly's avatar

Dutton’s embrace of a publicly run Nuclear industry without the expertise in the public service is an open embrace without any sense of contradiction of their magical thinking, whereby politicians claim to stimulate the economy and support jobs by cutting a tenth of the Public service (as Abbott did). The "cutting of Red Tape" and the cutting of more than a tenth of the public service during Abbott's time alone has had consequences. They stripped the size of the government to the point that it is incapable of functioning correctly for normal public functions, and now Dutton wants them to run a nuclear industry? WTF? Seriously? And who will build this with most of our manufacturing industry gone (thanks Hockey).

The consequences of the decimation of manufacturing and Public service under conservative rule have impacted other industries, such as education. The decline destroyed yet another training base for trades and reduced the intake of apprentices. The budget cuts of Abbott's administration also severely impacted apprenticeships. Tracking the causes, consequences, and level of damage to our employment economy has been made all the more complicated by Abbott's savage dismantling of expert advisory panels as compiled by Sally McManus. The elimination of free university education has resulted in a dumbing down of the Australian population. Where in the world are we getting the nuclear expertise?

The deteriorating of education results in quality standards in Australian Universities based on economic capacity to enter education and the resultant financial pressure to pass mediocre students, as opposed to passing them based on intellectual demonstrations of their quality of academic work. Identical circumstances exist in other Western countries. So, do we want these inferiorly qualified people running nuclear plants? FFS! (Sorry, I shouldn't be swearing twice in one comment, but... FFS!)

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts